for the sake of the children
Wednesday, April 27th, 2005i am a believer of divorce.
i actually fear the idea of getting married in the philippines because philippine marital laws dont have divorce. you can get legally separated, but i dont think you can get married. or something of the sort. there is just too much hypocrisy that i cannot understand.
i am a believer of divorce, only because it acts as a security blanket for me, in the event that my "i do" becomes an "i dont". in any case, i will move hell and high water to make it everything work. (well, a marriage isnt always sweet, that much i know.)
up until i met priscilla, grace’s cousin, it never occurred to me how jaded a 13 year old can get.
we were in my room last night, trying to decide which dvd to watch while his father fixed carlos’ chandelier/fan upstairs. i was asking her what kind of movies she liked. based on experience, when i was her age, i liked all those sappy teeny bopper flicks. i like all the love and the cheese. (yes, until now, i like watching those things. i recently saw princess diaries 2, the royal engagement. hehe)
and then she tells me. oh i like the ones with a lot of action, you know things going on.
and i asked her, dont you like those sappy stuff that makes you want to get married? (hey, ive been wanting to get married until i discovered dating.)
and she tells me, oh, i dont want to get married.
shock. a princess who doesnt want a prince.
in my head, i was thinking… "is there anything wrong with my childhood?"
we watched half of "the beach" until it was time for her to leave.
as soon as she left, my roommate told me all about her. she’s thirteen, her mother abandoned her, sent her to foster care and her dad had to go to court to prove paternity and to have rights over her. her dad and his present wife are separating and she is caught in the middle of it.
grace and i talked about this. we talked about our families. apparently, we didnt only share apartments, we also share the fact that our dads cheated on our mothers. we also share the same hypocrisy that our parents stayed together in spite of our dads’ philandering.
i believed in divorce because "the sake of the children" wasnt important to me. i was a child, and to me, separated parents mean more expensive gifts and a bigger allowance — that much i know from the friends that i have who have estranged folks. i was immature and materialistic. i was easily bought off with a truckload of ferrero rocher and a dozen blue roses. i hated the fact that husbands and wives blatantly lied to their kids. i hated the fact that i thought that they stayed together because they worry what their friends and relatives would say.
i just hated the fact that "for the sake of the children" is a valid reason to stay together. it sounded too cliche. too pretentious. martyr couldnt even begin to describe it.
but after seeing how she and her brothers turned out, me and my brothers turned out (only because we are the only set of siblings i know who has actually admitted this "my-dad-cheated-on-mom-but-mom-stayed") i cant thank my mother enough for staying.
to be on the losing end and enduring it was something i vehemently abhorred with a passion. whenever i voiced out this opinion as my mom and i watched tv, my mom just kept quiet. i now realize that ive said very hurtful things and she held her peace because she knew i didnt know what i was saying.
no matter how cliche "for the sake of the children" sounds, i realize that this is probably what it means.
husbands and wives with opposing opinions gravely affect the character formation of their children. its lies not only on the variable of the genes inherited, it also lies within the immediate environment that is provided to them.
i sort of understood how environment affects a child’s environment with the conversations ive had with my mother, but it is only now that i actually grasp the concept of it.
with this, i finally understand why philippine laws dont allow divorce. it really is for the sake of the children.